thrihyrne: Portland, OR (slash is love by me)
[personal profile] thrihyrne
I'm going to be revising my slash article and would like people's thoughts on a couple of things: One is the very definition of slash. Is it still slash if the characters canonically are already gay or bi? Say writing Queer As Folk fanfic. Is it slash or just fic about canonically gay characters?

The other is chan. Perhaps even more than incest, chan is controversial in the slash world. Thoughts?

Spread the word! I'd also like to put together a side bar of 'top slash pairings' in some large fandoms. The ones for HP are pretty obvious, but I'd also like to include Tolkien, Star Trek reboot, Merlin (though that's pretty much a one-hit wonder as far as I know)... Would people concur that the top three HP pairings are Harry/Draco, Harry/Snape and Remus/Sirius, as far as sheer fanfic volume over the past several years? What other fandoms are buzzing these days that have a high slash content?

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-15 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thrihyrne.livejournal.com
Yes, that's the rub: if they're already inclined toward the same sex, it's not really slash, which by its nature is about changing canon/adding in subtext to make straight characters fall for each other. But it's a bit fuzzy. As you say, we look for our m/m under the category of slash even if the characters are already gay or bi, so now there's grey area for sure.

I think the issue of chan comes up mostly in HP where the canonical characters for many of the books are underage, and authors definitely learned to warn for it. But some people love it.

I need to talk with some True Blood afficianados about any homoerotic content that could probably be traced to producers knowing about women's desire to see that on screen due to the widespread emergence of slash. It's conjecture, but probably accurate.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-15 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snottygrrl.livejournal.com
i think the meaning of slash has changed. the original meaning was two supposedly straight characters in canon being put together, but i think the definition has morphed into merely m/m or f/f romance. i think the torchwood fandom would consider m/m as slash even though the pairings work in canon [*shrugs*]

and i'd say as/s is the third most popular slash pair these days, not r/s. i see the most activity around them (bar hp/ss and hp/dm since canon closed).

also, are you including girl slash? or only boys? there is a fair amount of gwen/morgana, morgana/morgause in merlin, but if you're only doing boys arthur/merlin far outweighs arthur/leon, merlin/uther, merlin/will. the show just doesn't have many side characters to pair anyone with. it's pretty much only about merlin, arthur, gwen, morgana, gaius, uther and guest-star-of-the-week. series 3 has just started and it looks like we're going to get more of morgause and king cen(d)red, and as well as (perhaps) another knight with an actual name (so far only sir leon has had a 'role' other than standing around in a cape).

and chan to me implies one child and one adult and i have issues with it and tend not to get anywhere near it.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-15 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thrihyrne.livejournal.com
Well, perhaps slash is a more nebulous term anymore thanks to shows like Queer as Folk and Torchwood. I think I'll posit that as an element to the article. For the article I was only including m/m slash. And chan seems to be underaged, not necessarily a child and an adult, though I think that's what people find most controversial. I've read a couple of fics that I considered chan because both characters were underaged, and wikipedia seems to agree with that. But I think what most people are looking for warnings in regards to chan is the child/adult stories.

Thanks for your input!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-16 11:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haldoor.livejournal.com
I think you may be right about the producers of TB. Certainly, the dream sequence featuring Bill/Sam seemed to serve no plot purpose, but it certainly fulfilled a few wishes in the audience! ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-16 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thrihyrne.livejournal.com
Ooooh! A dream sequence that was probably related to the producers knowing about their fan base? Do you think I'd find that on youtube? I'd love to mention that in particular. I'm just now getting the beginning of True Blood via netflix.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-16 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haldoor.livejournal.com
Oh yes! Here tis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqTqhet3ZuU

It's completely awesome, although they stop before it gets really good, if you know what I mean. And it certainly didn't have any relevance to the plot at this point, nor has it been referred to again!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-09-16 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] haldoor.livejournal.com
There's also a pretty hot scene between Eric/Talbot, just before... well, that would be giving away the plot. ;-P But in case it furthers your article, here is the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnbE89jWXbc

And the character Lafayette (as per my icon) gets a boyfriend, Jesus, and they get some nice scenes - more loving perhaps than just sexual - too.

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
222324252627 28
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios