ext_64430 ([identity profile] snottygrrl.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] thrihyrne 2010-09-15 08:18 pm (UTC)

yes we were :D

but i first was just looking up chan without the wiki. when i looked at up the term via google lo those many years ago when i started this game, it only came up with definitions about child/adult sexual relationships. and referred to it as ch=child, a=adult, n=(implied)non-con. and that's what the term has meant to me. it didn't exist on the wiki or other reference places, just on fanfic definition places. now when i google, i only get an underage definition and being told it came from yaoi, even on some fanfic definitions pages, only they're on about it originating with starwars 1, which is just rubbish. i didn't find a single reference for it being child/adult.

i think the controversy around chanfic comes from the old definition, not the underage def. [*shrugs*]

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting